Posts Tagged ‘technology’

Dislike

Friday, January 29th, 2010

One of the saddest things about the Internet is the fact that it’s fostered an age of instantaneous opinions.  Remember Am I Hot Or Not (which is now a dating / social networking site)?  My friends and I spent hours there, laughing our heads off; it’s ingeniously set up so that you can’t see more funny photos without making a judgment about the one in front of you.  Facebook’s “like” feature is similarly shallow, but requires even less effort; there’s only “Like” (no “Dislike” except in the passive sense, constituted by a lack of reponse.)

What does this do to people, over time?  We’ll probably never know, of course; our lives are sufficiently complex that it’s impossible to isolate one specific feature.  But yesterday, I started thinking about it when I got into a disagreement with a student about the article she wants to write for the school paper.  She had the brilliant idea of a food issue, in which all the writers would share recipes and review restaurants and food-themed movies and TV shows.  Everyone was on board, chattering excitedly and throwing around ideas.  For her article, she asked to review nice restaurants in the area, possible candidates for pre-Prom dinners and fancy dates.  I told her, great; make up a list.

She returned her list to me the next day: it consisted of five or six steakhouses in Baltimore.  Hmm.  I gently suggested she branch out a little: what about seafood, for which Baltimore is renowned?  No, she’d only been to one seafood restaurant and hadn’t liked it.  What about a Brazilian churrasceria or one of the venerable pasta houses in Little Italy?  She hadn’t been there either.  What about people who don’t eat meat?  “Well, there’s other things on the menu.”  I suggested she talk to some other people about good restaurants, but she didn’t want to do that in case they might be wrong.  Bottom line: she wanted to write an article consisting solely of restaurants she had been to and liked a lot.

I made an appointment with the guidance counselor to talk this through, since I felt a lot of hostility toward the mere suggestions I’d dared to make.  But after that, I started thinking about how all this “Like”ing might have affected her ability to see the bigger picture and consider, if not respect, the opinions of others.  My students aren’t even offended when I say, “Who cares what you think?”  They simply dismiss the thought.  Of course people care.  It’s their opinion, and opinions are interesting, especially their own.

TV-Free, Sort Of

Monday, December 14th, 2009

When my husband was in grade school, he remembers his teacher casually mentioning once that she didn’t own a television set.

“I was shocked,” he says. “I thought, so, what do you DO all day?”

Now he takes more than a little pride in mentioning the fact that we also don’t own a television.  When we got married, my parents generously gave us their old one, but we never used it except for movies.  I refused to pay for cable, something I saw as a downward spiral ending in hundreds of dollars a month, so we only got a few channels.  My sister used to watch the Ravens games, which she said were blurry but at an acceptable level.  We may have turned the news on once or twice during a hurricane.

When we purchased a new computer, we discovered the screen was almost as big as the television we owned, so we gave away the television.  We continue to watch movies.  But television has crept back in, thanks to the Internet, where almost every show can be found for free, via legal means or otherwise.

I’m not sure how I feel about it.  For awhile, we only watched LOST, which I still maintain is the best show I’ve seen in a long time (and maybe ever.)  We’d go over to our friends’ house (or, more recently, my parents’ house, after converting them one summer) and watch, discuss, rail at the lack of answers and the plethora of questions.  I liked the fact that watching television became a planned social event, not just something to do to pass the time.

But then I started watching a few shows out of curiosity, mostly to keep up with my students.  Is Grey’s Anatomy really that wretched?  (It’s worse.  You have no idea.)  Is Desperate Housewives that vapid?  (Likewise.)  Is Scrubs that funny?  (No, but according to many of my friends, I haven’t given it enough of a chance.)  Is the Office?  (A resounding YES!)  For some reason, I’ve become totally hooked on The Mentalist; it’s not a groundbreaking show, but it’s funny and dramatic and I’m interested in the psychological aspects of the protagonist’s investigative technique.

What I’m starting to realize, though, is that I’m getting more tolerant.  I’ll sit through stuff I never would have before.  Last summer we watched several seasons of Weeds, which was funny at times but really not very high-quality and certainly didn’t affirm the kind of values we have.  This year Rob’s been watching Flash Forward, and I notice that I usually end up paying more attention to the crossword puzzle or my pile of vocabulary quizzes than to the screen.  I don’t want that.

So yes, we don’t have a television.  And yes, I brought the subject up myself, but not so I could brag about it.  Because I think in the end, it doesn’t matter.  More and more people will be following the Biltons’ lead and ditching TV for . . . TV.  In a different form.  I thank thee, Father, that I am not like other men.

Boring Old Facts

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

Rod finds a teacher* who agrees with me:

“They can crack the alphabetic code,” he said. “But they can’t stay focused and comprehend what they’ve read. And if they run into something that doesn’t seem right to them, they simply don’t believe it. I’m not talking about differences of opinion; I’m talking about facts. They don’t even form an argument against it, they just decide that it doesn’t feel true to them, so it must not be.”

Last weekend’s conference was saturated with quotes like this. My favorite was from a teacher who discussed 1984: it’s fantastically depressing, he said.  It’s about guilt and shame and lies and it’s awful.  I love it.  But I don’t care whether you love it.  It’s not about that.  It’s about the value of the novel.  What is the value in reading about surveillance, government?  If you can see value in it, your personal feelings about the book are really irrelevant.

Another teacher showed us all this cartoon.  There were a few scattered giggles, and then he asked us (about 200 in that session) honestly, if we’d “gotten it.”  About 25% raised their hands (I was not among them; although I did know who was in the cartoon, I didn’t get the football connection.)  The presenter explained that although we were all [presumably] intelligent and literate, we were missing a meaningful connection to the work.  This, he explained was how kids could read “Catcher in the Rye” but not understand Holden’s struggle with identity.  They get the words.  They just don’t get the deeper meaning.

(more…)

Fun with Words

Saturday, November 21st, 2009

At the Convention, sitting in yet another fascinating seminar.  (Not sarcasm there.  I am really enjoying it.)

Thought you might like to play around with this new tool, which apparently has already made the rounds among the cool English teachers: it’s called Wordle.

Basically, you just type in a bunch of words — a story, some ideas, etc. — and the program randomizes the arrangement, but uses the frequency of repeated words to determine their size; thus, a common word will appear larger, while a less common one will be smaller.  I used the Gettysburg Address for mine:

Gettysburg

You can play around with the arrangement, colors, fonts, etc., and ask it to ignore certain words (it automatically leaves out conjunctions, articles, etc.)

The teacher who presented this explained that it was useful as a character mapping tool.  Each student would list three descriptive adjectives for a character — the narrator of Rebecca, for instance.  Many used the obvious “wife” and “sad.”  Some said “plain” or “replacement.”  It was a great way to do a character analysis without even breaking a sweat.  A fun program, too!

The Lost Generation

Friday, November 6th, 2009

Have you seen this?  It’s pretty cool:

A former professor e-mailed it to me and said she could see it as an interesting activity for students to do — create a poem that could be read backwards and forwards.  I know it’s a little vapid and cliche, but I like it, and I think it could be inspirational to a demographic about which most are pessimistic.