Posts Tagged ‘green living’

Sweetness to the Soul, Health to the Body

Monday, August 24th, 2009

We are proud members of One Straw Farm, a CSA in Baltimore County.  (The owners, Joan and Drew Norman, were featured in Martha Stewart Living earlier this spring, much to our delight.)  Every week for half the year, we split a share of organic vegetables with my parents.  We pay less than ten dollars each for several bags stuffed with fresh produce — this time of year it’s sweet corn, summer squash of all shapes and sizes, baby red potatoes, garlic, watermelon, cucumbers, beets and lots of greens.  The farm is largely responsible for whatever healthy eating habits we have: almost every day I make a salad, throwing in some Amish eggs for protein, for an almost-completely local lunch (the dressing I make from imported oil and vinegar.)  I’m especially a fan of their red cabbage, which puts the dried-out slivers in bagged salad to shame.  Cabbage from One Straw Farm looks like an oil painting and tastes like spicy-sweet heaven.

Last week, when picking up our share, we were told that the farm had been hit hard by a tomato blight that wiped out many thousands of dollars in profit.  The situation was so dire, said the woman who runs our drop site, that if it hadn’t been for the CSA customers (who pay up front for the whole season) the owners might have had to sell the farm.

Overwhelmed by gratitude for these people, who risk their financial health so we can have nice dinners, I wrote them an e-mail.  It was brief; I just told them that they were in our prayers, and ended by saying, “It is an honor to be able to support you in some small way.  The work you are doing — bringing us fresh, healthy, diverse produce — is the greatest on earth.”

(It may sound like an exaggeration, but I swear it’s not.  I’m currently reading In Defense of Food, and it makes me angrier and angrier to see how, as a society, we’ve been tricked into eating substances that are so chemical-laden they can hardly be termed nourishment.  It is such a gift to be able to eat real food.)

I didn’t really expect a response — I know how busy farmers are — but that very afternoon Joan wrote me back, thanking me for the encouragement.  She said that after a tough morning, she had printed my e-mail and taken it out to the field (how’s that for technology?!) where Drew was working.  “I can’t thank you enough,” she said. “He is smiling again.”

Later, Drew wrote me separately:

My morning started with a complaint from a disgruntled customer.  Everywhere I turned, I ran into more headaches. I joke about spending my days putting out fires; as a rule, these fires are easily contained. Other times other times they merge into conflagrations beyond my control. Today I felt like I needed a team of smoke jumpers to rescue me. I believe you may have been that brave soul. Thank you so much for your kind words.

I was so humbled by this exchange.  Humanity is such a mysterious thing.  We can never predict how far the ripples of our words might travel through it.

Paperless Teaching

Tuesday, February 10th, 2009

As one of the advisors to our school’s Ecology Club, I am held to a higher standard.  Frequently, my students will chide me for “killing trees” when I pass out huge stacks of paper.  I try to scrimp wherever possible, using half- and even quarter-sheets and printing on both sides (my father loves to mock me for this; I do the same thing with our choir bulletin at church.)  And in my new Media Studies class, I took the radical step of e-mailing the readings as attachments so that the students could read them on their computers and print only if they wanted to, which may not have saved any net paper (most of them printed everything single-sided) but at least spared me the pain of looking at the whole stack at once.

But no matter how eco-friendly you are, there’s always someone who can outdo you, and in this case it’s Richard Wojewodski, a Baltimore teacher who has gone completely paperless.  This post will give you some insight into why he’s done this; it’s not all for environmental reasons, but because he thinks paper represents the past, a sort of static learning, while the future is represented in online collaboration.

I’m not sure I agree; I think the educational system’s departure from traditional learning — e.g. rote learning, memorization, basic skills — was a colossal mistake.  I have juniors and seniors, honor students, who don’t know their times tables.  They can solve a complex equation — as long as they can use a calculator.  They can write a paper — if they have a thesaurus to augment their vocabulary and SpellCheck to fix their errors.  And even within a computer, they rely on quick fixes instead of understanding the program.  They don’t know how to center text, so they just hold down the space bar until it looks right.  (Oh, yes.  I’ve seen this multiple times.) So I think that the physical piece of paper is important in many cases, because it represents information they need to know, cold, no matter what, even if they have to work a little to memorize it.

It’s also been proven that active reading, where you take notes and highlight the text, can help you remember information better than just passively reading it.  Not to mention, I think there’s something to be said for the responsibility factor: having to remember to type it, format it, print it, staple it and bring it to class.

That said, though, I’m pretty jealous.  It must be wonderful to have such support (and funding, good God — one computer for every single student) at your school.  Someday!