Posts Tagged ‘conservatism’

A Sheltered Life

Friday, July 31st, 2009

It occurred to me, after my diatribe about teenage drinking, that I had come out pretty strongly against the sheltered life.  So I’d like to share a counter-anecdote:

Last year one of my Creative Writing students came to me with a proposal for a poetry slam.  I said it sounded like a good idea, but she would have to plan it.  She did, and it was fantastic.  The day of the slam, the vice principal called me into her office and said, “I assume you’ve been approving all the submissions for the poetry slam?  There will be parents there, and I want to make sure everything is school-appropriate.”

Jeez.  No.  Hadn’t thought of that.  I called a hurried conference just before the slam and leafed through the pages.  One poem had a line about making out with a boyfriend and smoking cigarettes, and while this is certainly tame by HBO standards, we’re a very conservative school.  I asked the student if she would tame it down a little.  “But I don’t want to,” she said.  Ah, youth.

I tried again: “Angie, there are nuns here.”  There were.  Immediately she asked if we could get them to approve it, and relieved to be free of the burden, I said, “Sure!”

She turned to one of the religion teachers, who was nearby.  “Mrs. Lowe said this poem wasn’t appropriate to read around nuns.”  Well, I guess I technically did.  The sister was very gracious and said that although she didn’t necessarily agree with the actions in the poem, it was Angie’s “reality” and therefore acceptable in a poetry reading.

I’d felt bad about the way things happened, so quickly and without forethought, so later I sought the sister out to apologize.  “Oh, I wasn’t offended,” she said.  “But I do think there’s a problem with saying something’s not appropriate just because of who’s present.  Either it’s appropriate, or it’s not.”

I’ve heard this argument before about movies: if you won’t let your kids watch it, you shouldn’t watch it either.  And I agree with it, to a point.  Yes, there’s some stuff out there that’s inappropriate to say, think, do or even watch in the presence of any human being.  But there’s also room for maturity: I have been known to let fly a chosen swear word for purposes of humor and / or drama, but I would certainly never do so in church, or in front of my grandmother.  And in turn, I am honored when people refuse to repeat a dirty joke or show a graphic film in my presence. To me, it connotes respect: “You’re too good for that.”  There was a time when this applied to all women, not just nuns, and it’s too bad that time has passed.

American Parents: Ruining Lives since 1607

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

Articles like this are so melodramatic, they make me want to set myself on fire!

For those of you who are too lazy to read the link, the gist of the story is that in the new Harry Potter movie, there are a lot of drinking scenes.  As in, the kids are at a party where butterbeer is being served.  Or they’re sipping mead.  And Harry purposely gets two of his professors drunk in order to extract needed information from them.

First, let’s attack talk about the American drinking age.  It’s a common argument, but that doesn’t negate its logic: at 18, you can legally drive a car, fly a plane, buy a shotgun, have consensual . . . children with another adult, and die for your country in the armed services.  But you can’t have a beer.  Sorry.  No other first-world country has a drinking age as high as ours, and only three others have one over 18.  If you look at it that way, these kids (who are under supervision most of the time) are completely within their rights.

Second, as the article points out, butterbeer is never really explained in the books.  It may be somewhat alcoholic (she mentiones that house-elves can’t take as much as humans) but everyone drinks it, and no negative consequences ensue.  People, this is how we should be teaching our children about alcohol.  If we have no positive examples to offer them, they will learn the negative ones.

Third, I wonder whether copious amounts of alcohol would result in more state secrets than waterboarding?  It worked on Professor Slughorn.  And I don’t think it constitutes “cruel and unusual,” unless the alcohol in question was light beer.  Just wondering.

Why I Voted for Our President

Tuesday, January 20th, 2009

Happy Inauguration Day!  Our school announced it would be closed just last week, so we get to stay home (second quarter grades were still due in by noon, though — gotta love online grading, where you’re always accountable.)

I watched every major speech Obama gave during his long, slow rise to power, but I didn’t see any of them live.  I just never happened to be free then, or near a TV (we don’t own one.)  Today I was planning to go to my parents’ to watch; but when I checked the NYTimes website, it had a live feed that was quite clear and streamed through with very few hiccups.  It also had the advantage of being QUIET.  The only things I heard are things I would have heard if I had actually been there: cheering, music, polite applause, and of course the words of those on the stage.  I can only imagine how annoying it must have been to have commentators rattling off statistics about Michelle’s dress and Cheney’s medication levels.

As a registered Republican and someone who identifies more with the Libertarian Party than just about any other, I thought I would take a moment to defend my vote, which I cast proudly for our new President.

My reasons, in order from least to greatest, are below: