Posts Tagged ‘conservatism’

Is Smoking Sinful?

Saturday, May 8th, 2010

Talk about a loaded question.  It’s one about which I’ve often wondered, being a lifelong Christian and an occasional smoker.

Yes, it’s bad for you.  So is eating at McDonald’s.  And if done in moderation, it’s probably even less bad for you than McDonald’s, especially if you’re smoking anything other than unfiltered tobacco cigarettes.

Society has certainly demonized it, and as a borderline libertarian (who voted for Obama — hey, at this point I might as well alienate all of my readers) I tend to come down hard on the other side.  I think secondhand smoke is largely a myth.  I certainly think bars, restaurants and other private businesses should be able to decide for themselves whether to allow smoking on the premises. But that’s all politics and personal freedom, and the Church doesn’t care much for either.

My good friend Pastor Toby Sumpter recently posted about this issue, and I have to say, it’s one of the most thoughtful and balanced perspectives I’ve ever read on the subject.  He primarily addresses the students of his parish and school, but then broadens his argument to include all of us:

If 9 out of 10 of your elders, pastors, and teachers would frown at it, why do it? Aren’t we called to love? And love not only covers multitudes of sins, it looks for ways to die for others. Ordinarily, in our culture, cigarettes are self-serving and the only other people thankful for your indulgence are your friends who also know deep down (or not so deep down) that dad would really not be pleased with this. Is that love?

I’m still not sure what I think.  But it’s a pretty compelling argument: Christianity is about sacrificing for others, not doing what we want and forcing them into acceptance.  St. Paul, in 1 Corinthians: “But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumbling-block to them that are weak.” (8:9)  Just as interesting is the question of whether it’s morally wrong for a non-Christian to smoke for similar reasons — his own autonomy versus the pain and distress inflicted on those he loves.  Some people quit lifelong habits out of deference to their parents or spouses, and I’d like to think it’s not just because the nagging wore them down.

Anyone want to jump in with their two cents?  You thought I’d never ask?

Becoming Transparent

Monday, February 15th, 2010

Two weeks ago I made a list of all the non-Lenten food in our fridge, freezer and pantry: meat, fish, cheese, eggs, cream.  Then I turned the list into menus: bacon-wrapped turkey breast, stuffed with wild mushrooms; creamy, spicy, delicious, awful Buffalo chicken dip (ditch the chicken crackers and go for Fritos — trust me); Puttanesca with fresh Parmesan and salty anchovies; and Rob’s died-and-gone-to-heaven favorite, homemade macaroni and cheese.  As we ticked off the days during our long vacation (which continues now into tomorrow, due to yet another impending storm) I spent even more time than usual thinking about food — which, for those of you who know me personally, is quite an accomplishment.

The thing is, it started to get old.  The period between the Advent and Lenten fasts is short; shorter this year than I can ever remember, in fact.  So we habitually cram in dinners and parties from Christmas until Clean Monday.  I think we took the cake (pun very much intended) with a party that ended just before Forgiveness Vespers last night, when we welcomed twenty friends for champagne, chocolate tarts, blini with caviar and lox and artichoke dip.  It was a perfect afternoon to cap a season of feasting.  But as much as I love to think and talk about recipes and ingredients (even a great book or movie takes a distant back seat to a great meal, especially one enjoyed in the company of family and friends) I saw the balance tipping in favor of self-indulgence.  I was itching for some boundaries to keep me honest.

It might be an American thing, the tendency to overdo it and the desire to reign sovereign over many options, but I think it’s more plainly a human thing.  Thoreau wrote, “We do not ride the railroad; it rides upon us.”  He said it in 1854, but today, when we have so much at our fingertips, we are even more fooled into believing we actually control it all.

So today it was actually a great relief to not eat except a very little — a salad, a piece of fruit — and to spend time thinking, praying, bringing my body back into submission.  Even the thought of seven whole weeks without animal products seemed comforting, a journey of simplicity marked by the occasional dinner out (Southeast Asian, probably) or a much-appreciated glass of wine on a Sunday afternoon.  We are scaling back with our bodies as we throw the weight of our souls into the struggle — held up by prayers, confessions, the most beautiful hymns and the communal supper, the Eucharist, which we share with all creation.  Fr. George Calciu once told our congregation that fasting makes us transparent.  Not necessarily thinner (it’s not a diet) but lighter, clearer, more focused.  Our faults are laid bare, but so are our strengths; so is the beauty of the image of God within each of us.

This will be my thirteenth Lent, and I’m only starting to realize what a blessing this time of abstinence is.  May it be fruitful for all of us.

The PC Bandwagon

Tuesday, October 20th, 2009

I promised more, so here it is:

I’m a practical person, and I’m also pretty old-fashioned when it comes to teaching.  As a student, I demand a lot of myself.  My grades have always been high.  As a teacher, I demand a lot of my students.  I don’t like excuses.  I don’t like whining.  And I really don’t like entitlement.

The first night of class, my professor told us she thought teachers shouldn’t be required to take tests to be certified.  (“Some people don’t do well on tests.”)  I asked, how would she recommend we determine whether a teacher is fit for a teaching job?  She mentioned Problem-Based Learning, which, once explained, sounded an awful lot like a test under a different name.

Another time, she told us we should never require a student to read aloud.  (“Only choose the ones who volunteer.  Some students can’t read aloud, and it embarrasses them to try.”)  How, I asked, were they ever going to learn how if they didn’t practice?  Easy: I was supposed to tutor them outside of class, call their parents, lobby for an IEP and oversee the whole thing during, you know, my free time.

Even after these two experiences, I was unprepared for the Crowning Jewel of Political Correctness: ELL / ESL students.  These are immigrant children who don’t speak English well.  Here are some of the tips we received during class:

  • Learn a little bit of the students’ native languages so you can converse with them.
  • Allow the students to answer during class in their native language.
  • Add the works of artists, writers and scientists from their native cultures to your curriculum.
  • If they stop participating in your class, don’t push them.  Allow them to integrate at their own rate.
  • Put flashcards around the room with vocabulary words in English and their native languages.
  • Allow students to be assessed in their native languages, or to select assessments in their strongest area.

As I typed the notes, I could feel my color rising.  One thought came back to me repeatedly: ELLs are going to be the next Prize Disability.  Already, parents are rushing to get their children diagnosed with ADD so they can have preferential treatment on tests and in class.  (And yes, it absolutely is preferential: they are seated in the front of the room, checked up on with regularity, and generally coddled by the administration, who knows their parents will protest if the concessions cease. God help these children when they go to their first board meeting and declare their need for a Notes Buddy!)  The students who really do suffer from learning disabilities are done a disservice, too: cynical teachers (myself included) and resentful students make life difficult for them, and in many cases, such as a private school like mine, we simply don’t have the resources to give them the help they need.  It’s a real mess.

And now we have another oppressed minority to handle with kid gloves.  I’m sure all those suggestions are great ones, but they amount to tutoring, not teaching.  It is preposterous to expect a teacher to learn another language for the benefit of a handful of students, and it is equally preposterous to allow the student to dictate the terms of his own education.  Like I said, I’m old-fashioned.  Let the teachers teach.  Let the students learn.  Abraham Lincoln taught himself to read by candlelight.  Joe Louis proved a black man could be an American icon.  Barriers will fall only if we face them without fear and without whining.

Okay, tell me I’m an insensitive jerk.  Seriously.  Am I wrong?

The Speech

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

You knew it was coming . . .

For those of you who are living in the “dens and caves of the earth,” the President made a speech today addressing schoolchildren everywhere.  Here is the whole thing in three quick soundbites:

“At the end of the day, the circumstances of your life — what you look like, where you come from, how much money you have, what you’ve got going on at home — none of that is an excuse for neglecting your homework or having a bad attitude in school.  That’s no excuse for talking back to your teacher or cutting class or dropping out of school.  There is no excuse for not trying.

Amen.

The truth is, being successful is hard. You won’t love every subject that you study.  You won’t click with every teacher that you have.  Not every homework assignment will seem completely relevant to your life right at this minute, and you won’t necessarily succeed in everything the first time you try it.  That’s okay.  Some of the most successful people in the world are the ones who have had the most failures.”

Preach it!

“If you get into trouble, that doesn’t mean you’re a troublemaker; it means you need to try harder to act right.  If you get a bad grade, that doesn’t mean you’re stupid; it just means you need to spend more time studying.  No one’s born being good at all things; you become good at things through hard work.

THAT’S what I’m talkin’ about.  No excuses.  This was the most parent-like speech I’ve ever heard him give, and I mean it in a good way.  Yes, there were a lot of cliches, but we’ve been awfully heavy on cliches from the other side (You’re Perfect Just the Way You Are and other taglines of complacency) for a long time.  It’s good to hear someone advocate for hard work and struggle.

It’s almost hard to believe that there were parents out there (lots of them; many of them at our school) who wanted permission for their kids to AVOID watching this address.  No, please, whatever you do, don’t let my children listen to the President!  They might learn something about bipartisanship or self-sacrifice!  Yikes.

My only criticism was political: I thought he was about to mention the Suzuki Triangle (teacher, parent, student) but he stretched it into a quadrilateral with the addition of the government as a fourth corner.  I definitely don’t agree with this, but I am a recovering Republican, and it was only for a moment that I rolled my eyes before continuing to listen to and enjoy what was overwhelmingly a positive and (dare I say it?) conservative set of remarks.

Score one for tough teachers everywhere!

Old Students, New Tricks

Thursday, August 13th, 2009

Here’s a kid who is suing Amazon for “eating his homework.”  When they deleted 1984 off his Kindle, due to copyright violations, they rendered his notes unusable.  So he says.

It’s obviously a punitive lawsuit; if he took good notes, he’ll be able to apply them to a hard copy of the book without too much trouble.  (It is my experience that students don’t know how to take notes, however, so if I were his teacher I’d lord that over him incessantly.)

Teachable moments notwithstanding, I support the lawsuit.  It couldn’t have happened with a more fitting piece of literature, either: 1984 is all about the demise of personal freedoms in the name of safety and security.  It’s frightening, though not surprising, that Amazon can (and did) delete files from devices they sold free and clear to consumers.  What if Apple did that? I might not even be able to finish this po