Archive for the ‘Why I'm here’ Category

A Kind Person

Wednesday, June 9th, 2010

As a student, I looked forward to the end of the year with almost-uncontainable excitement.  As a teacher, I find it downright depressing.  All year, you’ve struggled to provide the best quality lessons, materials, strategies and encouragement to help your students learn.  At the end of the year, you see failures all around: the Literature student who has simply stopped turning work in because she’s so far behind she knows summer school is in her future; the SAT student who still doesn’t know how many sections are on the test; the Journalism student who thinks learning about world events was a waste of time because it wasn’t relevant to her high-school existence.  There are successes, too, but they seem less glaring, especially to someone with standards as high as mine.

This year I had all my students fill out an anonymous, online survey about their experiences in my class.  I do this for every class I teach, but this was the first year I’d been able to tabulate the responses instantly (thanks, SurveyMonkey!) and I think the students felt more free to be honest when they knew I couldn’t decipher handwriting.

The responses were mixed, as they always are.  There were plenty of good comments; many of the students said I was “knowledgeable,” “enthusiastic,” and willing to help them.  But there were also plenty of negatives.  They largely rejected my attempts at context-based vocabulary and wanted to go back to the inane, rote-memorization workbooks. I moved too fast; I didn’t review enough for the quizzes; the assignments were “childish.” Some wanted more test questions that resembled actual SAT problems; some were furious at me for including any at all.

One student in particular gave me basement-level ratings all the way through.  I think I know who it was; we got off on the wrong foot after an early  helicopter-mom confrontation, and although we were able to joke around with each other in class, I sensed her resentment and apathy.

However, at the end, under “What are the teacher’s best qualities?” she wrote: “She is a kind person.”

For me, that made it worth it.  I can’t please everybody, and I can’t even help everybody, especially those who don’t want to be helped.  But I can be kind.  And if I’ve done that, it was a good year.

Pink Girls and Beyond

Saturday, April 10th, 2010

One of the most frustrating things about being a writer is the lack of honest, blunt opinions.  People who love you tell you it’s wonderful.  People who don’t love you sometimes give you a limited compliment; sometimes they invent a platitude (I’ve actually heard that line at the end of Sideways, the one about “a great book” with “no place for it right now.”)  But mostly, they just ignore you.  This is the worst thing they could possibly do, but I’ve come to expect and even accept it.  So when you get a real compliment, you hang onto it.

After my first year of classroom teaching, I wrote a piece for my school’s alumni magazine.  It was a half-rant, half-rhapsody about teenage girls and how wonderful and frustrating they were to teach.  At the time, I wasn’t at all sure I would ever teach again, so it was a sort of swan song, just in case.  A little like my friend Chris’ (sadly, his piece has now been archived and costs money to view, but you can take my word for it that it was compelling and true-to-life.)

That summer, I asked my dear friend Terry for some advice.  I wanted to write more, but I was lost about how to do it.  Getting into the business is a lot like getting into acting or fine art: you have to know someone, or preferably, know a lot of people.  What should I do?  I wondered.

Terry is nothing if not direct.  “I think you should write more about the Pink Girls.”

At first I didn’t know what he meant.  Then he started suggesting reading material: Reviving Ophelia, A Return to Modesty, I am Charlotte Simmons, unhooked.  I read them all, but I had more questions than answers.  Mainly: What on earth was going on in the minds and hearts of these women, who were barely younger than me but appeared unable to take part in a healthy, normal relationship of any sort?

Of the four, I think unhooked resonated most clearly with me.  I could sense the author’s concern, shock and bewilderment in every page, all emotions with which I could sympathize.  I wrote the author, Laura Sessions Stepp, and wound up in an extended e-mail and phone conversation that continued sporadically over a few years’ time.

It’s been simmering for several years now, boiling over every now and again when I hear another story of serial hookup followed by serious heartbreak.  So when I had the opportunity to write about an issue of social justice for my current class, Child & Adolescent Development, I jumped.  The paper is much too long to post here, but I’ll give you a teaser in preparation for the next few posts, which will contain controversy-laden excerpts (having done my research, I’m prepared to be attacked, as has everyone who’s written about this from a point of view I admire:)

It’s no secret that teenagers tend to be emotional, volatile and insecure, or that they take evident pleasure in flouting the rules set for them by parents, teachers and other authority figures.  The last decade, however, has revealed a disturbing trend among adolescents that persists well into young adulthood: the replacement of healthy short- and long-term relationships with episodes of unplanned, emotionally-detached physical contact called “hookups.”

Sex is easier than ever for teenagers; we live in one of the most permissive societies in history, in which sexual innuendo permeates even the children’s entertainment market.  As a result, teenage pregnancies are on the rise for the first time in over a decade. I believe this is because our sex-education programs (some of which begin in elementary school) are falling short in a crucial area: emotions and relationships.  We are failing our young women by denying them models of healthy relationships, experiences they can learn from and build on, and forums where they can define for themselves what they want out of a partnership.  In denying them the tools they need to negotiate in relationships, we as a society have essentially set them up for continual failure, and only through a focused effort to reverse these conditions can we hope to change the pattern for future generations.

How bad is it, really?  You have no idea.  Stay tuned.

A King, a Prophet and a Priest

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

No, they didn’t walk into a bar.  They just made me think.

Tomorrow is the first of 11 days when I will be at church every evening for several hours.  There are a few days when I will practically wake up and fall asleep there.  In short, Lent is coming to an end.  And as you can probably tell from my sadly-neglected blog, it’s been harder and harder in the last few weeks to come up with something to say.

Lent is a time of growth – it involves taking a hard look at yourself and making some changes, throwing out things to which you’re attached and clinging to what is true and good.  It’s a time of prayer, thought, and sacrifice, and those things aren’t very easy or entertaining to write about.  It’s a time of testing, as I can always count on a major catastrophe or two to send me reeling, and one in particular has kept that promise this year.

But all this has been good for me in countless ways.  More than “good for me;” I’ve actually felt blessed by it.  Being sustained by grace, day after day, is a rare and precious experience. I marvel at the complexity of this message of hope I’m about to share, one that spanned many days and was borne by a diverse cast of characters. Yet it was obviously intended for me – it’s what I needed to hear, what I needed to learn.

From a king: “Sorrow is better than laughter: for by the sadness of the countenance the heart is made better.”  I’m slowly working my way through the Old Testament on CD, and I realized last week that I hadn’t read Ecclesiastes since college.  It’s an amazing story of a king who had all the world had to offer, yet realized how worthless it all was without some central meaning.

Why do we flee sorrow?  Why do we tell each other to smile, put on a brave face, project the appearance of success?  Pain is such a crucial, beautiful, beneficial part of life.  As I read the rough drafts of my students’ term papers last week, I was stuck by how many of the world’s most formidable literary talents had lives that were wracked by sorrow: illness, rejection, guilt, struggles, death.  To a person, these writers turned their sorrows into keenly incisive works that speak plainly of the human experience.  This is why literature, and all of art, is so moving to us.  We are fallen.  It’s a fallen world.

From a prophet: “[Food] will taste so much deeper, more intense.  Everything will feel that way for awhile.  You’ll feel more alive.  You should probably try to hang onto that feeling for as long as you can.  It’s a gift.”  It might be a bit of a stretch to call a fictional character a prophet, but I think that’s his closest title.  I heard this while watching The Mentalist, a formulaic detective drama that for some reason is awfully compelling.  I am mainly drawn to the title character, a man who has undergone a traumatic loss and is consumed with a desire for revenge, coupled with an unbearable grief that he largely hides from those around him.  I call him a prophet because he is able to understand others at a level far beyond ordinary humans, but the sad irony is that he isn’t able to understand himself – or isn’t willing to.

In this situation, he is speaking to a girl who has just lost her mother.  I love the simplicity of his speech, and the fact that he doesn’t pull punches with her, telling her it will be all right or her mother is in a better place – but also doesn’t apologize for what he can’t control.  Having been through an even worse experience himself, he is serenely circumspect – seeing everything and taking this experience for what it’s worth.  Her mother is dead.  This experience will change her.  The change could be a good thing.

From a priest: Man’s punishments from the Fall were really second chances for humans to restore communion with God. We work the earth in toil, but we enjoy the fruits of our labors. We bring forth children in pain, but we still desire each other.  We have knowledge of pain, but also knowledge of a source of healing.

That’s a paraphrase from the Lenten retreat I attended last weekend with Fr. Theodore Dorrance; I vowed I would not take notes during this retreat, since I never re-read them anyway and I felt I could listen more deeply if I wasn’t concentrating on writing everything down.  But I didn’t need to write it to remember the impact of what he said.  What an illumination!  Even our greatest punishment – what makes us uniquely human, our suffering and alienation – can be viewed as a gift.  If we were self-sufficient, we wouldn’t need God.  I rejoice in my infirmities as a means for acquiring even greater healing.

Lent draws to a close.  It was a good Lent, if only for these three small things – things that have helped me to see clearly, to be stretched, to cut away the excess and feel freer from the world.

Lent is Dangerous

Saturday, February 20th, 2010

From my good friend the Rev. Toby Sumpter:

Stephen was stoned to death. James was beheaded. Matthew was pinned to the ground and beheaded. James the brother of Jesus was thrown off the temple tower and clubbed to death. Following Jesus is dangerous.

Matthias was stoned and then beheaded. Andrew was crucified on an X-shaped cross. Mark was dragged to his death. Peter was crucified upside down.

Paul was beheaded. Jude was crucified. Bartholomew was beaten and crucified. Thomas was tortured, run through with spears, and thrown into the flames of an oven. Luke was hung from an olive tree.

If the season of Lent is an annual, concentrated reminder of the call of discipleship, the call to follow Jesus, then Lent is dangerous.

Lent is dangerous because there is historical controversy associated with it. While it had been celebrated for over a thousand years by the time of Calvin, there was so much superstition associated with it that he counseled against keeping Lent. Lent is dangerous because there are a number of ways to celebrate it badly: morbid introspection, conjuring up vague guilt and feeling holy for it, prideful abstaining from food and drink, looking down on those who don’t celebrate. False humility is as easy as lighting a dead Christmas tree on fire. One little spark and we puff up.

But Lent is dangerous ultimately because the cross is dangerous. The message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing but to those who are being saved it is the power of God (1 Cor. 1:18). To those who want to find another way to grace, another path to mercy, the cross is an offense (Gal. 5:11). The sinful heart of man is offended by grace, offended by the folly of the cross. We would rather be proud in all sorts of ways.

Read the rest! It’s wonderfully arresting and sound advice.

The Mythic in the Everyday

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

This is what life is all about, for me — moments of loveliness that pass unnoticed most of the time:

All of which converged
into a random still life,
so fastened together by the hasp of color,
and so fixed behind the animated
foreground of your
talking and smiling,
gesturing and pouring wine,
and the camber of your shoulders

that I could feel it being painted within me,
brushed on the wall of my skull,
while the tone of your voice
lifted and fell in its flight,
and the three oranges
remained fixed on the counter
the way that stars are said
to be fixed in the universe.

Thank you, Billy Collins.