Archive for the ‘Methods’ Category

It’s Not What You Say

Friday, August 27th, 2010

Although I have always believed this, I was still shocked to hear the following statistic at our first faculty meeting of the year.  When you communicate with another person, here is how they interpret your message:

Words: 7 %

Tone and inflections: 38 %

Body language: 55 %

It makes sense, really.  Our principal used this statistic as the basis for our new communication policy at school, and I think it’s a good communication policy for just about anyone’s school, business or life:

Words: this is e-mail and text messaging.  Since it’s just words, it should be relegated to the simple relaying of information: “I’ll meet you at 4 PM” or “Here’s the outline for the next chapter.”  The minute the exchange becomes more complex, it should move to a more personal level.

Tone and inflections: phone calls.  Most minor negotiations and problems can be resolved this way.  “Why did my daughter get a zero for this assignment?”  “How can I get my son to practice more regularly?” “Let’s work out a time to get together.”  There’s something so much more personal about the sound of a spoken voice: it can nip a lot of misunderstandings in the bud.

Body language: face-to-face meetings.  For anything important, whether a job interview (yes, they do take place over the phone, but it’s rare) or catching up with an old friend.  Taking the time to sit down with someone shows you care enough to give them your full attention.  This is how we run our classes, and it should be how we run our lives, too.

I take a lot of flack for staying away from Facebook and chat rooms and even my own cell phone, which I would prefer to be without.  But I take pride in knowing that I can give someone my full attention, my full presence, whether it’s a client, student, or friend.  I was at a party this week where I saw a man find out his wife was pregnant via text.  Can you imagine?!  No, thank you.  I want my relationships real.

Fully Dressed

Wednesday, August 25th, 2010

During one of our games at the workshop last week, Michiko reminded us to smile and be relaxed even when we’re concentrating hard.  It was fun to look around the circle and watch the frowns and furrowed brows soften into expressions of happy interest.

It also reminded me of the time I was teaching a student the difference between piano and forte.  “Here are two letters: p and f.  The p stands for that instrument over there – what is it?”

“Piano.”

“Right, and we say it like this:” I dropped my voice to a whisper. “Piano.  What do you think it means?”

“Quiet?”

“Exactly right.  And its opposite is this one, the f. It stands for forte, and we say it like this: Forte!”  I did my best brash, confident forte voice.  “What do you think it means?”

“Um,” the student hesitated demurely. “Mad?”

I laughed, but more out of shame than amusement.  You would think that I would have learned, after that, to regulate my expressions around young children!

However, a year or so later, I was teaching the same game to a three-year-old boy, an only child with a very quiet disposition.  He was interested, engaged, excited.  We got to the last one, ff.  Exhilarated, I jumped up and shouted, “FORTISSIMO!”  He burst into tears.  His mom and I both burst out laughing, which was about the worst response we could have had, I’m sure.

The number of little things to remember while teaching is depressingly long; even with constant reminders, it’s so difficult to keep them all in mind at once.  Someday, maybe I’ll have it all down.  Or not.

Playing Into Their Hands

Saturday, August 21st, 2010

Sitting in a circle, fourteen teachers speak our names in rhythm with quarter notes: Lau-ra. Blue. James. Blue.  There is nervousness, laughing; one tries to show off and flops, another gains confidence after a timid first attempt.  We are teachers, so playing the student’s role forces them out of our element.

This week I was privileged to be able to assist Michiko Yurko at a workshop of Music Mind Games, the cooperative theory games I use in my piano lessons with great success.  During our orientation, I took great interest in this list of answers to the common question, “Why games?”

  1. It’s easy to hold students’ attention with a game; everyone loves them.
  2. Students relax and learn faster.  As Michiko said, “When their minds are open, you can stuff all kinds of things in.”
  3. Memory training happens naturally.  As a musician, you need to have an excellent memory, one that serves you even in a chaotic situation.
  4. Students learn to work together cooperatively.  There are lots of implications here for careers, religion, and even personal relationships!
  5. Students feel progress and a sense of accomplishment, whether or not they win.
  6. Students are empowered to learn rather than to be taught.
  7. Students are happy to repeat games, which is fundamental to learning.  Every teacher would love to phasing herself out, looking on while students work on their own; playing games enables her to do that.
  8. Games engage multiple learning strengths; visual, oral, kinesthetic.
  9. Games are adaptable to different ages as well as different subjects.
  10. Games create a manageable sequence of skills.
  11. Games allow teachers to personally relate to each student – instead of thinking about a class, you’re thinking about a person.
  12. Games allow teachers to evaluate comprehension and track progress without testing.  Students learn from each other, and teachers learn from their students.
  13. Games are fun for teachers, too!

As I took notes and listened to her talk, I realized these were all things I was aiming for in classroom teaching, too.  Why can’t I play grammar games with my literature classes, or brainstorming games with the budding authors in Creative Writing?  I suppose because it would take a lot more work than the traditional methods.  Maybe I can come up with just a few for this year.  Any ideas?

A Tough Time

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

These next few posts will probably be a little scattered.  I’m digging through the mammoth pile of papers I accumulated last year (I do not exaggerate — it’s the size of a third-grader) and finding lots of interesting things.

The first comes from a youth event Rob and I orchestrated several years ago.  We would love to be more involved with the youth program, but time is always the problem.  This particular instance was a bit of an anomaly; I’d just read Unhooked and was desperate to do something for the girls in my parish who, while maybe not as extreme as the subject of Laura Stepp’s investigation, definitely needed help.  We decided to separate into boys and girls, with three leaders each — one dating, one single and one married — and give the kids a chance to talk.

I’m not sure what happened behind the guys’ door, but the girls had a good discussion.  We started by having them all write questions or problems down — what were they most struggling with?  What did they want to talk about?  These neat little squares are what I discovered today, folded up in the bottom of my inbox:

  • Finding / Demanding respect from a guy all the time.
  • How do you know when your ready to date some-one!
  • When people don’t understand what you feel like.
  • Do you think birth control is considered abortion?
  • There is this guy I know that has “gone out” with most of the girls in our group (which is pretty big) but they don’t really do anything. I think it’s kind of pointless!
  • You can never be in charge of a relationship.
  • Finding a guy that is actually truly INTERESTED, in more than sex.
  • Nobody ever confides in you.
  • Why do you even have to “like” guys at all.  It’s annoying!

While some of them made me laugh and some made me sigh, they all made me very grateful to be an adult.  I wouldn’t go back to high school for anything.

Such a Thing

Sunday, July 25th, 2010

I wrote my grandmother a postcard from Paris.  I told her Rob and I were having fun, but also working hard to keep the students in line.  At the end, I added: “We have decided that there is, after all, such a thing as a stupid question.”

It sounds uncharitable, I know.  But you wouldn’t believe some of the gems we encountered on that trip.  Our favorite was the day we took the students to Versailles.  After touring the chateau, we stepped out into the garden, amid Baroque music and twinkling fountains, and surveyed the acres upon acres of gardens that, after four visits, I have still not completed touring.  Planes of green stretched as far as the eye could see, broken only by the spiderweb of white footpaths and the marked orbs of bright azure pools and verdant topiaries:

It was this hushed and grateful silence that our students broke to ask, first, if there were any shade in the gardens, and second, if there were any trees nearby.  The expression on Rob’s face must have caused the latter student to rethink his question, because he hastily added, “Well, I mean, I can see the trees down there . . . but are there any closer to us?”

Very wisely, Rob responded without sarcasm or condescension.  He just said, “I’m going to let you think about that.  I’ll come back to you in a few minutes.”  And we walked out to the gardens, where we found views like these:

Not only are there trees and shade in abundance, it’s actually nearly impossible to take a photo in the gardens that doesn’t include both.

Okay, that was one of the worst questions.  But they kept coming throughout the trip.  The students didn’t know where the subway stop was for our hotel, even though we’d returned there multiple times a day.  They wanted to know when the Arc de Triomphe was built a few minutes after someone had made a presentation and handed out brochures with that exact information.  We got used to repeating every directive three or four times, as in: “We’re going to Villa Savoye today.” (“Where are we going?”) “We’re going to Villa Savoye today.” (“Oh, we aren’t going there tomorrow?”) “We’re going to Villa Saoye today.” (“Should I get my Villa Savoye materials, then?”)

It was a minor annoyance; as Mike likes to remind us, if they get on our nerves, hey, they’re getting on our nerves in Paris.  We patiently helped them navigate the subway, look up pertinent information and hear the itineraries, again and again.  We saved the shocked laughter for our private kir sessions, and we reminded ourselves that while this was in some ways a dream vacation, it was also a job.

And I kept thinking about the questions even after we got back, since they are the same kinds of questions I encounter in the classroom on a near-daily basis.  What page are we on?  When is this due?  What was the answer to number 7?  Something about the presence of a teacher makes us turn our brains off.  We are so reluctant to look for the answers ourselves, to trust our own logic and intelligence rather than having the solution spoon-fed to us.  Here I include myself; I have only recently begun forcing myself to pause before I send any e-mail with a question in it, and often I’ll find that I do know how to find the answer – it’s just that it involves more work than simply asking someone else for it.

It’s so easy to be philosophical at the beach, far away from the day-to-day frustrations and joys of the classroom.  So, while I’m thus removed from the situation, I’m on the hunt for a humorous and compassionate way to deter these inane questions, the questions that make me want to climb the walls of the classroom and breathe consuming fire on it.  I like Rob’s response, but it would be tedious to repeat many times a day.  Maybe having another student answer, as proof that it is possible to pay attention?  I’m afraid that might be too embarrassing for both parties.  I’ll keep thinking.  Feel free to join in.