Archive for July, 2009

Political Animals

Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009

“If you went to your own room at midnight, locked the door, pulled down the blind, and SNEEZED, Mrs. Lynde would ask you the next day how your cold was!”

Lucy Maud Montgomery, Anne of Avonlea

Such is life in a small town.  And such is life in a small parish, too.  One Friday morning I had to leave Liturgy early, as I wasn’t feeling well.  I whispered this to a friend, and asked her to take home the children of another friend I had brought with me. The next day at Vespers, and the following day at Liturgy, I had half a dozen parishioners, and my priest, inquire with concern about my health.  (I was rather ashamed, as I hadn’t been deathly ill and probably should have just stuck it out, and had to repeat that information over and over.)  Not only that, but they each shared a different remedy: one recommended yoga, another fruit juice.  All promised prayers, and I was both touched and embarrassed by all the attention.

This memory came to mind as I was reading an excerpt for class last week about the Greek polis.  The author, H.D.F. Kitto, writes beneath a thick layer of nostalgia and idealization that I consider a little misplaced (he didn’t actually live in ancient Greece, so I think it’s a bit like a lifelong Midwesterner fantasizing about moving to the colorful, exciting world of New York City: amorous and a little naive.)  However, I was able to glean some very interesting information about the idea of the polis.  We usually call the polis a “city-state,” but that’s a terrible mistranslation: in truth it encompassed a whole way of life, wherein each polis was independent and self-sufficient, a microcosm of society as a whole.  People lived close together and knew each other well, so this made it difficult to, say, plan an insurrection or run off with the wrong person.  It was really a sort of family, and as such, fights were all the more bitter and the sense of community all the more palpable and vivid.

The clincher is that Aristotle’s famous saying, “Man is a political animal,” is a victim of this same mistranslation.  What he really meant to say was, “Man is a creature of the polis.”  We function best when part of a small society where we can watch out for one another; even the closeness that can be grating is good for us, as it teaches us patience and humility.  Jane Jacobs saw this on Hudson Street in Manhattan, where neighbors threw their doors open when a loud drunk would wander through, keeping an eye on him until the police arrived.  In fact, the vast majority of urban planners have tried to create these sort of enclaves within the larger, more alienating city structure.

Me?  I don’t know any of my neighbors.  The first Christmas we arrived here, Rob and I made plates of cookies and left them for 6 or 8 of the closest homes on our corner; only one stopped by to thank us and introduce himself, so that’s the one whose name we know.  The others we know by identifying characteristics of race (The Mexicans, whose house appears to be the promised land to Maia), pets (Dog Lady, whose many canines erupt every so often into a chorus of howls) or lawn care (Hedge Guy, who gives us a real fright a couple of times a summer when he climbs onto a rickety old ladder to trim his monstrous hedges with what looks like an electric knife.)  We know who they are, but we don’t know where they’ve come from, what they do or who matters to them.  In fact, if I met one in the grocery store, I probably wouldn’t even recognize his face.

Too bad. For all of us.

Procrastinate Today! Don’t Put it Off!

Tuesday, July 21st, 2009

A dear friend has this bumper sticker displayed prominently in her classroom.  I couldn’t agree more.  I got up early to prepare for my class this evening, as I am woefully behind on reading.  However, I ended up reading a very interesting post on Crunchy Con about the “growing awareness and emotional maturity” of a young Russian girl.  Her father made a documentary about her, “Anna,” by asking her a series of simple questions every year for twelve years.

I’m probably about as aware and emotionally mature as I’ll ever be, but I found the questions intriguing, so here you are:

What do you love the most? God, of course, and my family and friends.  But I also love life.  I love grilled flatbreads with garlic dipping sauce (thanks, Gretchen!)  I love movies that make me think.  I love digging in the dirt and mowing the grass.  I love airports (minus the TSA screenings) and Bombay Sapphire and Vermeer and Schubert.  The good moments, as a Tralfamadorian might say, but the bad ones too, because without those, there would be no learning — and above all else, I love to learn!

What do you hate the most? Apathy.  I know it’s a cliche, but it’s true.  People who don’t care — about their work, their homes, their attitudes, the effect they have on others and on the world around them — they add darkness to the world.  That, and Crocs.  And un-righted wrongs.  And Michael Jackson’s music, dancing, and death-extravaganza coverage.

What scares you the most? The thought that I might not be doing the right thing with the unknown number of days I’ve been given on this Earth.  I’m not trying to be dramatic.  I really worry about this quite a bit, especially with regard to my job.  I wish there were some way to know I’m in the right place.

What do you want more than anything right now? Materially, nothing.  I have been blessed beyond my wildest dreams.  Intellectually, I want stronger discipline, but that’s something I can only give myself!

What do you expect from life? Struggle and redemption.

What does the homeland mean to you? Speaking from a comfortable, coddled perspective, not very much; in fact, I am growing increasingly dissatisfied with it.  We are so fixated on personal happiness and material goods.  And I have never felt very attached to the city or country of my upbringing.  Of course, that might be different if I were forcibly moved elsewhere.  Like I said, coddled.

I want to hear your answers!  Comment below or link to your blog.

Comments on Comments

Monday, July 20th, 2009

I like the idea of comments.  I also like when my friends, family and the occasional stranger leave comments.

I do NOT like policing for spammers.  Boo, spammers!  When I returned from France I had to delete several hundred of your dumb comments.  After discovering how to block individual keywords and IPs (which I think stands for Interfering Poopyheads) I thought I had gotten them all, but still there are a few almost every day.  Please ignore them.  That’s my goal.

Today I finally checked the box reading, “Comment author must have a previously approved comment.”  I think that means that if you haven’t commented before, I’ll have to see your comment and okay it before your e-mail address will be cleared to comment as much as your heart desires.  So, don’t panic if you don’t see your comment posted right away.  Whatever you do, don’t post it a whole bunch of times.  That would be a little like, oh, putting in both of your Metro tokens at once.  Right, nameless family member?

Deconstructing Harry

Monday, July 20th, 2009

Every evening in Paris, I would peel off all my miracle blister pads and soak my feet in our teeny-tiny bathtub for an hour or two, trying to summon the strength to go to dinner.  Rob would hover at first, feeling sorry for me, asking if I needed anything.  My answer was usually, “A kir.  And my Harry Potter book.”

If you don’t know about kir, you owe it to yourself to find out more.  But I don’t think you could be a living, breathing human on planet Earth and not know about Harry Potter.

I finished Book 5 on the plane home from Paris and Books 6 and 7 shortly thereafter.  (Thanks to my friends who loaned me books throughout my quest!)  So from here on out, let no one say that my criticism of the Potter saga is uninformed.

And yes, it is still criticism.  I still don’t think she’s a very good writer.  The plots are interesting, but overly convoluted; I kept fighting to keep from attacking the thing with a red pen, as there were paragraphs and pages that were completely unnecessary.  In fact, there were whole plotlines that were unnecessary.  (One word: SPEW.)  My students seemed to think that there was some amazing final scene that brought together elements from every yawner scene in the saga, but I never found it, although I enjoyed the foreshadowing, particularly the many layers of Severus Snape.  I do agree with Laura that the stories are fun, but seriously (an Anna Karenina fan speaking here) they are TOO LONG!

So it should come as no surprise that as I watched the remaining movies (including the new one, which we saw very late Thursday night) I felt a sense of vinidication.  The movies are just better.  They’re cleaner, more impressive, make more of the important relationships and less of the tangential ones.  There was only one point in any of the books where I started to get a little emotional (at the very end, when the ghosts of Harry’s departed loved ones join him in his final journey — it’s hard not to get choked up there.)  But the films are far more moving, especially Harry’s interactions with Sirius and Dumbledore.  The special effects are fun, the actors are believable, and the plot snips are, as I said, an improvement.

I could spend a lot more time bringing up little picky things, but I don’t know that it would be worth it.  I understand the fascination with a world of fantasy, but I would rather my children read better examples of literature (Lewis, McDonald, L’Engle, Tolkien.)  However, I am definitely looking forward to the next two movies.  And I guess I will grudgingly admit that as an English teacher, I would rather my students read Harry than read nothing at all.

Travel Study, Vacation, or Both?

Sunday, July 19th, 2009

Whenever Rob or I have mentioned in the past few months that we got to go to Paris for free as part of a travel-study program, the reaction is nearly always a groan of grudging empathy.  And I have to admit, it is a pretty sweet deal.  But as my friends and family know, we were catching up on sleep for weeks afterward; it was a LOT of work, even with one of the best groups of college students I’ve ever encountered.  I can’t imagine what it would be like if one or two of them had had a nasty attitude, or a fear of new experiences.  Or if they had all been middle or high schoolers.  I am even more convinced that my French teacher, who changed our lives when she took a group of 15- and 16-year-olds to France, is a living saint.

I won’t bore you with the details of every single architectural monument we visited, but here are some hints for making your trip run smoothly:

Plan.  Plan.  Plan. Be ridiculously organized.  Everyone has a different system; the Appendix in Ron Clark’s Excellent 11 has lots of great ideas for organizing (and finding funding for) travel study trips. Spontaneity is not fun when there are dozens of people following your every move.  One of the smartest things we did (Rob did, that wonderful man) was to order passes for transit and museums ahead of time.  We didn’t have to wait in line, which made us feel rather smug when it stretched all the way out of the building and around the block.

Be flexible in case the unthinkable happens and your careful plans don’t work out.  Every evening we nervously came up with a “good day / bad day” plan in case it poured rain, which had been predicted for every day of the trip; amazingly, we only had to use the “bad day” plan once.  However, we were glad to have it.

Divide and conquer. We had 18 people on the trip.  On the first day, we counted to 18 so many times we were ready to ban the number entirely, and we still managed to lose two students in a department store.  Starting on the second day, we broke up into three groups of six, since there were three trip leaders.  It was much easier counting to six, and since we all had phones, we could still communicate if we were separated.

Get to know your companions. This was a community college trip, so ages and backgrounds varied widely; for me, the charm of the group was learning something about each person we traveled with.  One had majored in French in college, but never been to France in the 40 years since her graduation; another had been raised by deaf parents and was fluent in sign language.  It makes for interesting conversations during meals or train rides, and it helps you function as more of a team if you’re on friendly terms.

Don’t wear new shoes.  Even if they are Danskos and your cousin has told you they’re comfortable and high-quality.*  Even if they’re cute and black and strappy and match all of your outfits.  Even if they were only $35 instead of four times that much.  By the second day I had so many blisters that last week, several weeks after my return, a young student exclaimed, “You have SO MANY cuts on your feet!”  Mike told me about these miracle blister pads he’d found in Italy, and after I’d had several roundabout conversations with pharmacists, I discovered the word for blister (ampoule, which actually refers to a light fixture of the same shape) and the remedy, which was a miracle indeed.  (I don’t know if they sell them here.  These look close, but mine had much nicer packaging!)

So, there you go.  Oh, and don’t forget to have fun.  That’s the best advice I can give!

*Emily was right (as Emilys tend to be.)  The shoes are now the most comfortable ones I own.  It just took some time to break them in!